China to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060

2020-11-11 at 8:23 Timo Löyttyniemi

The most important piece of news this autumn was China’s pledge that the country would become carbon neutral by 2060. While it may not have come as a surprise, the declaration will have major implications on world politics, international investments and hopefully the climate over the next few years. China may well be hailed as the winner in the coming decades.

Towards carbon neutrality

One country after another has issued declarations on carbon neutrality. They are based on the Paris climate convention. Accordingly, each country has made a commitment to carbon neutrality, but is free to announce the timeframe within which this objective is to be achieved. For Europe, the target is the year 2050 and for Finland 2035.

Competition over carbon neutrality will attract increasing attention over the next few years. It is downright incredible that countries have been able to agree on carbon neutrality on a global scale. It is one of mankind’s biggest common decisions.

United States lost four years

The United States’ environmental policy has suffered setbacks during President Trump’s term. He has announced his country’s withdrawal from one international agreement after another. The Paris climate convention also received a blow. The president’s leadership in climate matters is at variance with global trends which point away from fossil fuels to renewable natural resources. The November elections are also about the environmental policy that the United States will pursue over the next few years.

China sceptics

Sceptics have repeatedly pointed out that the pollution generated by China is disproportionate. Western companies have relocated operations to China. Many think that Chinese companies enjoy an unjust advantage due to lax environmental standards and requirements. China’s recent declaration on carbon neutrality by 2060 turns all previous doubts into a renewed belief in a major change in future. China’s investment will be massive. As a result of this transformation, China will probably take the lead in technological expertise in climate issues. It will underpin China’s global leadership.

At present, some 75% of China’s energy is generated using coal and oil. This should change over the next few decades to the extent that about 90% of all energy will be produced by fuels other than fossil ones. No wonder that the Wall Street Journal noted that China’s carbon neutrality declaration is “the biggest climate commitment made by any nation”.

Europe on the right track

European countries and the European Union strongly support carbon neutrality. But making changes is always challenging, as it calls for the right leadership and successful implementation. There are no guarantees for this, and the road ahead is full of potholes and chicanes. Even so, European leaders are taking determined steps to achieve carbon neutrality in the continent by 2050.

Conclusions

China’s declaration on carbon neutrality positions the country as the global leader. It will impose this vision on all fields of activity. China will be able to implement the efforts centrally. Chinese companies are bound to become technology leaders in new areas. Europe stands a good chance of succeeding if it is able to put its vision into practice. European companies are more agile than governments in achieving changes, but governments need to make decisions to facilitate and accelerate them.

The writer is VER's CEO Timo Löyttyniemi.

TLö blogi 2020

Recent posts

2024-11-28 at 14:23
2024-10-25 at 10:56
2024-10-10 at 13:15

Tags

acceleration active investing added value AI alternative investments asset classes austerity measures authoritarian governments baby boom baseline capitalism carbon border tax carbon emissions carbon footprint carbon intensity carbon neutrality carbon risk carbon tax carbon-neutral economy carbon-neutrality career central banks choices circular economy climate change climate commitments climate crisis CO2 emissions collateral commercial paper market commodities concentrated markets contingency plan contrarian corona crisis coronavirus coronavirus crisis countermeasures covid crisis covid economy crises crisis crypto currencies currencies debt burden debt structures decision-making defence industry defence policy defence technology degrowth democracy demographic trends demography dependency ratio depression derivatives development digital money digitalisation dilution disease monitoring system diversification Draghi ECB economic competition economic development economic growth economic policy economic system economy effective treatment electricity exchanges emergency measures employment figures energy export energy exports energy imports energy prices energy war environmental policy equity market equity markets escalation ESG EU EU elections euribor Europe exchange rates expected returns external borrowing FAAMG Fed financial crisis financial market financial markets financial stability Finnish Centre for Pensions (ETK) fiscal policy fixed income investments fixed-income investments forecasting fossil fuels free trade funding ratio funds GDP geopolitics global trade globalisation globalization government debt government finances green growth green technology green transition Growth healthcare systems hedge funds illiquid assets increase in prices indebtedness index investing index weighting indices inflation Innovations institutional investor institutional investors interest level interest rate interest rate level interest rates internal market international trade investment investment beliefs investment environment investment returns investment risk investments investments contribution approach joint debt Kauppalehti level of risk liberalism long-term return low-carbon economy market crash market economy market forces market interest rate market movements market portfolio market rallies market reaction markets megatrends miracle momentum monetary policy ownership policy pandemic pension investments pension investors pension liability pension promise pension system pension systems planning political decision-making portfolio structure positive side effect predatory traders pre-funding preparedness presidential elections price fall private equity private markets protectionism real estate investment real estate investments real estate market real estate sector rearmament recession regulation renewable energy renewable natural resources rescue packages responsibility restrictions retirement retirement age returns on investments risk bearer risk level risk management risk profile Russia sanctions scenarios security investments short squeeze sovereign debt spill-over effect stagflation state state ownership stimulation stimulation packages stock exchange stock market stock markets stock prices stock-exchange markets stocks strategic allocation strategic autonomy strategy success support measures supportive actions sustainability target retirement age taxation taxes technology the leading powers The United States timeframe for liabilities timing totalitarianism transition risk Trump trumponomics uncertainty venture capital virus war war of aggression wealth welfare state